Hey everyone,
I’ve been tinkering with a few dating promotion campaigns lately and noticed something tricky — getting users to sign up isn’t the hard part anymore, it’s keeping them around. I’m curious if others here have faced this too. You can have a perfect ad, great copy, and a killer landing page, but after a few weeks, your active users drop faster than your CPC graph after budget cuts.
For me, the struggle really started when one of my campaigns got impressive traffic but super short retention. It felt like people were showing interest out of curiosity, not commitment — typical of dating audiences, right? At first, I blamed the creatives, then the offer, and eventually the timing. But the more I looked into it, the clearer it became — retention in dating promotions isn’t just about user quality, it’s about post-click experience and emotional engagement.
Pain Point – Getting sign-ups but not retention
When I first ran dating promotions, I focused entirely on conversions. CTRs looked great, sign-ups were coming in fast, and cost per lead was under control. I thought I’d cracked the code. But by the end of the first month, most users just stopped engaging. The app team shared that matches were dropping, sessions got shorter, and notifications went unopened.
That’s when it hit me — we were running campaigns like typical lead-gen funnels when dating audiences actually behave like emotional buyers. They don’t just “convert” once. They need reasons to stay connected, to feel the excitement or novelty again and again.
I think many advertisers treat dating traffic like e-commerce traffic — push an offer, get a click, done. But dating apps aren’t one-time purchases. The real metric of success here is retention, not just acquisition.
Personal Insight – What I tried and what failed
So I started testing. My first idea was to retarget those users with “come back” ads — short, catchy reminders that played on curiosity or humour. You know, things like “Someone just matched with you” or “You’ve got unread messages.” Sounds good on paper, right? But it flopped. Turns out, unless users actually felt something missing, they didn’t care to come back.
Then I experimented with emotional sequencing. Instead of pushing features, I built the ad journey around “connection moments.” The first ad focused on curiosity (“Who’s near you?”), the next around belonging (“Meet people who get you”), and then reward (“Here’s what you missed”).
This layered emotional message felt less like marketing and more like storytelling — and oddly enough, users stayed longer. The retention curve didn’t shoot up instantly, but the drop-off slowed down a lot.
Another tweak that worked was matching ad tone with app experience. If your ad promises “real connections” but the app lands users on a paywall or a flashy interface, that mismatch kills trust instantly. Keeping consistency across the ad and landing experience made a noticeable difference.
Soft Solution Hint – What actually helped
Over time, I realised retaining users isn’t just about one trick — it’s a combination of authenticity, emotional consistency, and well-timed engagement. Dating audiences want something that feels personal, even if it’s algorithm-driven.
For those struggling with retention, I’d suggest rethinking your journey mapping. Don’t just look at clicks and installs — study what happens in the first 24 hours after they join. That’s the emotional window. If users don’t get something meaningful in that time, they’re gone.
There’s actually a pretty helpful breakdown here on How to retain users from a dating promotion campaign. It goes into behavioural insights, triggers, and post-campaign follow-ups — worth a read if you’re experimenting with retention hacks like me.
What worked best for me was blending re-engagement with subtle emotional nudges — things like personalised match updates or shared interest prompts. Even small UI notifications (“You’ve got a message from someone who loves hiking&rdquo
made users feel seen and kept them coming back.
Final Thoughts – It’s not just numbers
I think the biggest mindset shift for anyone doing dating promotions is this: don’t treat your users as clicks, treat them as emotional participants. Every impression, CTA, and in-app prompt adds up to how “real” your dating platform feels.
If the campaign tone matches what the app delivers, retention becomes less of a fight. Sure, metrics matter — ROAS, CTR, retention rates — but at the end of the day, you’re marketing human connection.
So yeah, I wouldn’t say I’ve mastered retention, but after running a few messy campaigns, I’ve learnt that hacks are less about fancy automation and more about understanding why users return.
Would love to hear if anyone else here has found something that actually works long-term. Is it messaging, timing, or maybe how offers are presented inside the app?
Because honestly, in dating promotions, keeping users hooked is way more valuable than getting them to sign up in the first place.
Hey everyone,
I’ve been tinkering with a few dating promotion campaigns lately and noticed something tricky — getting users to sign up isn’t the hard part anymore, it’s keeping them around. I’m curious if others here have faced this too. You can have a perfect ad, great copy, and a killer landing page, but after a few weeks, your active users drop faster than your CPC graph after budget cuts.
For me, the struggle really started when one of my campaigns got impressive traffic but super short retention. It felt like people were showing interest out of curiosity, not commitment — typical of dating audiences, right? At first, I blamed the creatives, then the offer, and eventually the timing. But the more I looked into it, the clearer it became — retention in dating promotions isn’t just about user quality, it’s about post-click experience and emotional engagement.
Pain Point – Getting sign-ups but not retention
When I first ran dating promotions, I focused entirely on conversions. CTRs looked great, sign-ups were coming in fast, and cost per lead was under control. I thought I’d cracked the code. But by the end of the first month, most users just stopped engaging. The app team shared that matches were dropping, sessions got shorter, and notifications went unopened.
That’s when it hit me — we were running campaigns like typical lead-gen funnels when dating audiences actually behave like emotional buyers. They don’t just “convert” once. They need reasons to stay connected, to feel the excitement or novelty again and again.
I think many advertisers treat dating traffic like e-commerce traffic — push an offer, get a click, done. But dating apps aren’t one-time purchases. The real metric of success here is retention, not just acquisition.
Personal Insight – What I tried and what failed
So I started testing. My first idea was to retarget those users with “come back” ads — short, catchy reminders that played on curiosity or humour. You know, things like “Someone just matched with you” or “You’ve got unread messages.” Sounds good on paper, right? But it flopped. Turns out, unless users actually felt something missing, they didn’t care to come back.
Then I experimented with emotional sequencing. Instead of pushing features, I built the ad journey around “connection moments.” The first ad focused on curiosity (“Who’s near you?”), the next around belonging (“Meet people who get you”), and then reward (“Here’s what you missed”).
This layered emotional message felt less like marketing and more like storytelling — and oddly enough, users stayed longer. The retention curve didn’t shoot up instantly, but the drop-off slowed down a lot.
Another tweak that worked was matching ad tone with app experience. If your ad promises “real connections” but the app lands users on a paywall or a flashy interface, that mismatch kills trust instantly. Keeping consistency across the ad and landing experience made a noticeable difference.
Soft Solution Hint – What actually helped
Over time, I realised retaining users isn’t just about one trick — it’s a combination of authenticity, emotional consistency, and well-timed engagement. Dating audiences want something that feels personal, even if it’s algorithm-driven.
For those struggling with retention, I’d suggest rethinking your journey mapping. Don’t just look at clicks and installs — study what happens in the first 24 hours after they join. That’s the emotional window. If users don’t get something meaningful in that time, they’re gone.
There’s actually a pretty helpful breakdown here on How to retain users from a dating promotion campaign. It goes into behavioural insights, triggers, and post-campaign follow-ups — worth a read if you’re experimenting with retention hacks like me.
What worked best for me was blending re-engagement with subtle emotional nudges — things like personalised match updates or shared interest prompts. Even small UI notifications (“You’ve got a message from someone who loves hiking”) made users feel seen and kept them coming back.
Final Thoughts – It’s not just numbers
I think the biggest mindset shift for anyone doing dating promotions is this: don’t treat your users as clicks, treat them as emotional participants. Every impression, CTA, and in-app prompt adds up to how “real” your dating platform feels.
If the campaign tone matches what the app delivers, retention becomes less of a fight. Sure, metrics matter — ROAS, CTR, retention rates — but at the end of the day, you’re marketing human connection.
So yeah, I wouldn’t say I’ve mastered retention, but after running a few messy campaigns, I’ve learnt that hacks are less about fancy automation and more about understanding why users return.
Would love to hear if anyone else here has found something that actually works long-term. Is it messaging, timing, or maybe how offers are presented inside the app?
Because honestly, in dating promotions, keeping users hooked is way more valuable than getting them to sign up in the first place.